More Details on HR669 Legislation
Many of you had additional questions regarding the proposed legislation. I forwarded the initial email which was written in part by Attorney Genny Wall who represents AFA. The additional information also comes from her. I’ve also included some links to the government sites referring to HR669. I hope this additional information explains a little more about HR669 and the damage it will do if passed.
www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-669
thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:h669
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Again, if you haven’t done anything about HR 669 yet, please read the the previous Blog post on WindyCityParrot.com then make your voice heard.
Here’s the link to the capwiz, the EASIEST AND FASTEST way to get your feelings heard! www.capwiz.com/naiatrust/home/ size="2" color="#008000" face="Arial"> (Then click on the Take Action HR669 link and follow the directions.
If you
still have doubts, you can contact Genny Law directly if you have more
questions - her email is
gennygem2@aol.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background on HR669
FYI for those interested in details read the attached PDF. It is for educational and discussion purposes for those dealing with people on pet (or other lists) that are naively or intentionally proclaiming "HR 669 won't affect me/us". If you read it you will understand Marshall's points raised against the predecessor bill (HR 6311), which will be relevant to counter these claims about this year's HR 669.
Representative Bordallo introduced a predecessor bill in 2008 (HR 6311) that is pretty much the same as this year's HR 669 - and HR 6311 didn't pass out of committee last year. We are looking for the same result this year.
Attached is a PDF of the testimony of Marshall Meyers of PIJAC before the subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife and Oceans, House Natural Natural Resources Committee that heard the 2008 bill.
HR 699 (this year's version) is going before the Insular Affairs, Oceans and Wildlife committee on 4/23/09.
Thanks,
Genny Wall
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More talking points:
Feel
free to use any of these points in your discussions with naysayers on HR
669.
You can see the full text of the bill here: <http://frwebgate.
1. PERMITS
Any permits that may be issued are only for importation.
Permits or exclusions from the prohibitions of HR 669 will not be available
to individuals (including pet owners) under HR 669.
The bill provides that permits may only be issued to specified entities for
specified approved purposes.
If you don't qualify under Section 7 you don't get a permit for
importation.
SEE HR 669, SECTION 7
"SEC. 7.
Permits.
(a) In general.—The Secretary may issue a permit authorizing importation
otherwise prohibited under section 6(a)(1), for scientific research,
medical, accredited zoological or aquarium display purposes, or for
educational purposes that are specifically reviewed, approved, and verified
by the Secretary, if the Secretary finds that there has been a proper
showing by the permittee of responsibility for the specimen and continued
protection of the public interest and health wi th respect to the specimen.
(b) Terms and conditions.—The Secretary may include in a permit under
subsection (a) terms and conditions to minimize the risk of introduction or
establishment of the nonnative wildlife species in the United States."
2. GETTING YOUR SPECIES ON THE "APPROVED LIST"
If your favorite species is/are not included on the initial "approved list", you can try to get it/them "approved", but that will take time and lots of money to get even one species added to the "approved list".
Under the bill any "interested person" can submit a "proposal" that a species be approved, and that proposal must include "sufficient scientific and commercial information" to allow the Secretary to evaluate the proposal. The proposal process requires payment of a fee (yet to be determined), publication in the federal register, and the proposal must be open to public comment.
Of course the inevevitable objections from the animal prohibitionists will follow publication of your proposal, and should the listing be approved, we can expect the inevevitable lawsuits to follow. The animal prohibitionist organizations have the money to do this, while most individuals, and even most businesses, do not. It is unlikely that many species will ever get listed using the "proposal" process.
If your
proposal isn't approved after the lengthy proposal process your species
won't be20"approved"
Are you ready to fight this battle for your favorite species? Can you afford to invest the time and money required with no guarantee that you will be successful?
SEE HR 669 SECTION 4
"SEC. 4.
List of Approved species.
.....
(c) Proposal for inclusion on the approved list.—
(1) Submission of proposals.—
(A) In general.—After publication of the final preliminary list under
subsection (b)—
(i) any interested person may submit to the Secretary in accordance with
subparagraph (B) a proposal to include a nonnative wildlife species in the
approved list under this section (including a request to import such a
species that is not in the list published under this section and section 5,
respectively)
(ii) upon receipt of a complete proposal under clause (i), the Secretary
shall publish notice of the proposal in the Federal Register and provide an
opportunity for 30 days of public comment on the proposal.
(B) Information required.—Any proposal under this paragraph must include
sufficient scientific and commercial information to allow the Secretary to
evaluate whether the proposed nonnative wildlife species is likely to cause
economic or environmental harm or harm to other animal species’ or human
health.
(2) Determination.—Based on scientific and commercial information provided
in a proposal under paragraph (1) or otherwise available to the Secretary,
the Secretary shall make one of the following determinations regarding such
a proposal in a reasonable period of time and in accordance with the
regulations issued under section 3:
(A) The nonnative wildlife species is approved for importation, and is added
to the list of approved species under this section.
(B) The nonnative wildlife species is not approved for importation, unless
permitted under section 7.
(C) The Secretary has insufficient scientific and commercial information to
make a determination under subparagraph (A) or (B).
(3) Treatment of unapproved species.—If the Secretary makes a determination
under paragraph (2)(B) that a nonnative wildlife species is not approved for
importation, the Secretary shall include the nonnative wildlife species in
the list of unapproved species under section 5.
(4) Notice of determination.—The Secretary shall publish in the Federal
Register notice of the determination made under paragraph (2) and make
available on a publicly available Federal Internet site or through other
appropriate means, the basis for the determination. "
3. ADDING SPECIES TO THE "UNAPPROVED LIST"
Note that
HR 669 provides a similar mechanism for "any person" to try to get any
species added to the "unapproved list".
The animal prohibitionists can use the provisions of HR 669 to add any
species to the "unapproved list". Again, they have lots of money available
for this purpose that individuals and businesses do not have.
A re you ready to fight this battle for your favorite species? Can you afford to invest the time and money required with no guarantee that you will be successful?
SEE HR 669 SECTION 5
"SEC.5. LIST OF UNAPPROVED SPECIES
.....
(b)
Proposal for inclusion on the list of unapproved species.—
(1) Proposal.—
(A) In general.—Any person may submit to the Secretary a proposal to add to
the list under this section any nonnative wildlife species.
(B) Information required.—Any proposal under this subsection must include
sufficient scientific and commercial information to allow the Secretary to
evaluate whether the proposed nonnative wildlife species is likely to cause
economic or environmental harm or harm to other animal species’ or human
health.
(2) Notice.—The Secretary shall publish notice of a complete proposal in the
Federal Register and provide an opportunity for 30 days of public comment on
the proposal.
(3) Determination.—Based on scientific and commercial information provided
in a proposal under paragraph (1) or otherwise available to the Secretary,
the Secretary shall make one of the following determinations regarding such
a proposal in a reasonable period of time and in accordance with regulations
issued under section 3:
(A) The nonnative wildlife species is not approved for importation except as
provided in section 7, and is added to the list of unapproved species under
this section.
(B)20The nonnative wildlife species is approved for importation.
(C) The Secretary has insufficient scientific and commercial information to
make a determination under subparagraph (A) or (B).
(4) Treatment of Approved species.—If the Secretary makes a determination
under paragraph (3)(B) that a nonnative wildlife species is approved for
importation, the Secretary shall include the nonnative wildlife species in
the list of approved species under section 4.
(5) Notice of determination.—The Secretary shall publish in the Federal
Register notice of the determination made under paragraph (3) and make
available on a publicly available Federal Internet site or through other
appropriate means the basis for the determination.
Genny Wall
Attorney at Law
Sheryl Robinson
President
Northern Illinois Parrot Society
847-254-0591 (cell)
Visit www.nipsparrot.org for more information
Raise money for the Northern Illinois Parrot Society just by searching the Internet with GoodSearch - www.goodsearch.com size="2" color="#008000" face="Tahoma"> - powered by Yahoo!



ShareThis


Please join me in opposing, H.R. 669, the Nonnative Wildlife Invasion Prevention Act. This Bill is being advanced by powerful special interest groups and creates an unworkable process which is designed to fail. The government simply does not have the resources to evaluate the thousands of nonnative species already in this country for years and meet the unrealistic listing criteria and timeframes in the law, and such a process is unnecessary for controlling truly invasive species. There is absolutely no evidence to suggest that banning the import, sale, and trade of the vast majority of these animals will have any positive effect on the economy, environment, or human or animal species' health. In fact, if passed as drafted, H.R. 669 would destroy many families and businesses. It would have a decidedly negative impact on an already ailing economy by destroying a vital and growing industry at a time when our country is in need of jobs and growth.
Pet lovers such as myself support a legislative solution that targets species which may actually be invasive, rather than every species not originally native to the U.S., including thousands of species that have been in this country for decades without adverse impact. This Bill is a disaster to American business owners as well as pet owners who care deeply about their pets and face having to dispose of them because of a flawed law.
To Oppose HR669 please visit www.nohr669.com
Your pets are counting on you
Reply to this